What did the Artists from ‘Midnight in Paris’ Look Like in Real Life? 19th Century
min Read27 February 2021
In Woody Allen’s 2011 Midnight in Paris, Owen Wilson plays a nostalgic screenwriter who somehow finds himself transported back in time to 1920s Paris. A time period which Owen’s character, Gil Pender, deems a “golden age of thinking.” In a previous article I showed you the filmmakers’ creations of the 20th century artists, here are the celebrities of the Belle Époque. Meet 19th century artists portrayed in Midnight in Paris!
Though their depiction in the 2011 film is short (let’s be honest, I wish the film would have continued its peek into the world of Moulin Rouge and the artists of the 19th century), the overall theme of the movie lends itself to this brevity. Gil Pender’s time travels are a form of escapism into a world with which he feels he better identifies, likewise to Adriana’s desire to be a part of the 1890s Paris, not the 1920s which she considers to be dull. She even chooses to stay in the past, furthering this idea of escapism and her idealistic thoughts.
Height of Paris in the 19th Century
Adriana dreams of living in the late 19th century of Paris. A time synonymous with the Moulin Rouge, Montmartre, and such artists as Degas and Gauguin. (In turn, these artists believe the “time to be alive” was the Renaissance… are you able to see the trend?) Though their inclusion in the film is left to the last minute, they are no less important than the main figures of Part 1 to this piece. They help Gil to see that he will always be yearning for a different time much like the other artists in the story.
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, a famous painter of 19th century France, was known for his unique style, as a poster-artist and painter. His famed works include scenes from the Moulin Rouge, as well as realistic depictions of women around him.
As a young boy, Toulouse-Lautrec suffered from breaking both his femurs and they subsequently never healed properly. This, among a plethora of other congenital health conditions, contributed to the deformation of the lower portion of his body. He only grew to just above 5 feet tall. Since he could not participate in many of the same activities as his fellow compatriots in France, Toulouse-Lautrec turned to art, diving in wholeheartedly. His art reflects the bohemian nature of Paris at the time.
The below image still from the movie showcases a few things to note: the alcohol on the table is indicative of Toulouse-Lautrec’s rampant alcoholism. It is no surprise that he turned to alcohol in order to forget the pain he carried in his body. The artist, portrayed by Vincent Menjou Cortes, is depicted as short, rather timid in nature, alone, and focused. As far as appearances go, the actor looks much like the artist from the waist up. Below, a sample of the script shows how others perceived the artist.
One of the many ways to determine a Degas painting is the presence of ballerinas. Degas’ work featured the young girls as he captured their likeness in several mediums. The inclusion of the artist in the film is no mistake as he helped to pioneer Impressionist art, although he himself did not like the term for his own work. Working alongside the other artists portrayed towards the end of the film, they transformed the style and techniques of the period, artistically navigating into the period of Post-Impressionism.
Since the inclusion of these three artists is left to the last part of the film, their depictions and characteristics are generalized. For example, in Degas’ case Gauguin asks, on behalf of Degas, portrayed by François Rostain, if Adriana wants to help design costumes for the ballet dancers. This reflects back to Degas’ heavy focus on the dancers in Paris during his active years in Paris.
Eugène Henri Paul Gauguin, though born in France, spent time in Peru, France, Denmark, and Tahiti. He was enraptured by Asian and African cultures which shows in his work, also his work was considered to be more savage than that of his contemporaries. By the time depicted in the film, Gauguin had been married, had several children, and divorced.
Like Degas and Toulouse-Lautrec, Gauguin’s depiction (Olivier Rabourdin) is just as generalized. For instance, Gil asks him essentially why he is not in Tahiti at this exact moment. The artist responds that while he does in fact live there, that business in Paris called. (Gauguin spent his last few years in Tahiti, but had a brief stint back in Paris.)
One of the main differences between the portrayal of artists in the beginning and the end of the film is the generalization throughout. Because some artists, writers, or musicians only appeared briefly, it was about packing as much information as possible into a short scene. As a result, some of the nuances are lost to brevity. Perhaps Gil should travel back in time in another installment of Midnight in Paris. Or perhaps he should travel to the Renaissance, in “Midnight in Rome.”
We love art history and writing about it. Your support helps us to sustain DailyArt Magazine and keep it running.
DailyArt Magazine needs your support. Every contribution, however big or small, is very valuable for our future. Thanks to it, we will be able to sustain and grow the Magazine. Thank you for your help!