Bavarian-born Barbara Regina Dietzsch (1706–1783) was one of the finest botanical artists and engravers of her time. Her work was unparalleled for its delicacy of execution and hyperrealistic detail. When we look at her work, we enter a world of gauzy, spiraling formations and precise biological observation, brought together to form exquisite paintings of often extremely transient subjects. Let’s have a look at the botanical art of Barbara Regina Dietzsch.
Barbara Regina Deitzsch, left to right: Pear Blossom, Roses and Lilies, Anemones and a Phengaris Arion, 18th century. Wikimedia Commons.
Building on the work of artists who went before her, for example naturalist and illustrator Maria Sibylla Merian (1647-1717), Dietzsch took this particular field of art beyond the remit of the scientific diagram. She set a benchmark for excellence that has influenced botanical artists ever since.
Maria Sibylla Merian, A Parrot Tulip, Auriculas, and Red Currants, with a Magpie Moth, its Caterpillar and Pupa,2nd half of 17th century. Wikimedia Commons.
The earliest botanical works were herbals. These were manuscripts containing the names, medicinal properties, locations, and of course the appearances of various plants. Doctors and apothecaries used herbals as guides to the properties and applications of different flora. They became the blueprints for later works on the subject of botany in medicine.
Plants not only had practical value, but were also seen as objects of great beauty, often with symbolic significance. They were often found, for example, adorning the borders of books of hours.
Master of the David Scenes (attr.), St. Francis receiving the stigmata from Book of Hours of the use of Rome, Grimani Breviary, early 16th century, Bodleian Library, Oxford, England, UK. A New Flowering: 1000 Years of Botanical Art, Shirley Sherwood.
Nature was observed as a matter of course by artists painting in vivo. That is to say, flowers and other plants were studied, often with attendant beetles, butterflies, or other insects. Both Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519) and Albrecht Dürer (1471–1528) observed and produced studies from nature. It was a practice which was seen to be invaluable in the development of technical artistic skill.
Left: Albrecht Durer, Great Piece of Turf, 1503, Albertina, Vienna, Austria. Wikimedia Commons.
Right: Leonardo da Vinci, Sprigs of Oak and Dyer’s Greenweed, c.1506-12, Royal Trust Collection, London, England, UK.
It wasn’t until the beginning of the Scientific Revolution, towards the end of the Renaissance period, that the artistic reproduction of plants, or botanical art, became a pursuit in its own right. The need for more accurate and extensive catalogues of flora became of great importance. It was particularly important for those who either observed or collected in foreign and unfamiliar parts of the world. Plants in every variety began to occupy the realist artist’s time. The closer to faithfully reproducing nature a draughtsman could come, the better. The botanical art of Barbara Regina Dietzsch is an outstanding example of this practice.
Barbara Regina Dietzsch, A Branch of Gooseberries with a Dragonfly, an Orange-Tip Butterfly, and a Caterpillar, 1725-1783, National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, USA.
By the time of the 17th and 18th centuries, botanical art had become more than the reproduction of detailed drawings for inclusion in an ever-growing reference library. It had transformed into a genre of its own. Botanical painting had its roots in antiquity, but by the time of Dietzsch it was reaching its summit – a period of artistic and technical excellence in the field.
Left: Barbara Regina Dietzsch, Matthiola Incana, 2nd half 18th century.
Right: Barbara Regina Dietzsch, Butterfly and Verbena, 2nd half 18th century, Arader Galleries, Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
The botanical art of Barbara Regina Dietzsch is impeccable in its execution, even with materials that would now be considered to be old fashioned. She possessed a technique so refined and linear, as might be expected from an engraver. She was able to render even the most diaphanous and flimsy flower in an unearthly way. As a result, Dietzsch set a high standard for other artists to meet.
Barbara Regina Dietzsch, Flowers with Butterfly, 18th century, private collection. Sothebys
When we talk about other botanical artists following in her footsteps, we can include Dietzsch’s sister, Margaretha, whom she taught to paint. Margaretha Barbara Dietzsch (1726–1795) also focused on botanical subjects, predominantly fruit and flowers, but also enjoyed drawing birds.
Margaretha Barbara Dietzsch, Dandelion with a moth and a smaller green moth or butterfly, in a landscape with a bank and pink sky, between 1741-1784, British Museum, London, England, UK.
It would be remiss not to mention Ernst Friedrich Carl Lang (1748–1782), for whom the botanical art of Barbara Regina Dietzsch was a great inspiration. For example, her influence can be seen in his renditions of flowers and insects. His attention to the transience of petals, the frailty of butterfly wings, and the overall fragility of his subjects, demonstrates the same respectful attention to detail which we find in Dietzsch’ work.
Ernst Friedrich Carl Lang, left to right: Queen of the night (Selenicerus grandiflorus) with spider, Blue ranunculus with postillon and sitting beetle, and Tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa / Agave polianthes) with mother-of-pearl and fly, 18th century, Arader Galleries, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
The whole Dietzsch family was involved in essentially the family printmaking business. Barbara’s father was Johann Israel, an artist employed by the Nuremberg City Courts. One of her brothers – Johann Christoph (1710–1769) – had similar employment. Below are two thistles: one Barbara created (left) and another Johann created (right).
Left: Barbara Regina Dietzsch, A Study of a Thistle, latter half 18th century. Wikimedia Commons.
Right: Johann Christoph Dietzsch, Thistle with Insects, c. 1755, National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, USA.
Dietzsch beautifully reproduced even the most complex botanical formations accurately enough for scientific record. However, they were works of art entirely in their own right as well. The genre of botanical art has remained popular. Artists such as Brigid Edwards, Ann Swan, Pauline Dean, and Susannah Blaxill have produced paintings of botanical subjects ranging from Brussels sprouts and eggplants, from pinecones to mushrooms. Botanical art isn’t only about what we consider to be traditionally pretty – a notion that has possibilities in other genres perhaps?
Enjoy the following pictures!
Left: Brigid Edwards, Douglas Fir: Pseudotsuga menziesii, 20th century.
Right: Susannah Blaxill, Aubergine, 20th century. Both works in the Shirley Sherwood Collection. A New Flowering: 1000 Years of Botanical Art, Shirley Sherwood.Pauline Dean, Fly Agaric: Amanita muscaria, 20th century, Shirley Sherwood Collection. A New Flowering: 1000 Years of Botanical Art, Shirley Sherwood.
Ann Swan, Brussels Sprouts, 20th century, Shirley Sherwood Collection. A New Flowering: 1000 Years of Botanical Art, Shirley Sherwood.
Click and follow us on Google News to stay updated all the time
We love art history and writing about it. Your support helps us to sustain DailyArt Magazine and keep it running.
DailyArt Magazine needs your support. Every contribution, however big or small, is very valuable for our future. Thanks to it, we will be able to sustain and grow the Magazine. Thank you for your help!
Forensic Psychology MSc student with a fondness for ghost stories, those of M. R. James in particular. Sarah has been writing for Daily Art since 2016, firstly for the app and later the magazine, and all her cats are named after characters from Bram Stoker's Dracula.
With the publication of Tar Beach in 1991, Faith Ringgold launched her career as a picture book author and illustrator. Her interest in picture books...
Tracey Emin is one of the most prolific artists of our generation; perhaps one of the few capable of triggering such profound and disruptive emotions...