Connect with us

DailyArtMagazine.com – Art History Stories

Still lifes Too Vivid To Be Real- Imagined Realism in Luigi Lucioni’s Art

Still Life with Blue Vase and Fruit, Luigi Lucioni, ca. 1924, Worcester Art Museum

20th century

Still lifes Too Vivid To Be Real- Imagined Realism in Luigi Lucioni’s Art

For some people, realism is defined by painting what they see. For Luigi Lucioni, it meant painting what he thought was there. Luigi Lucioni’s art was an imagined realism, a reflection of his own perception of reality that often appeared more vibrant than life itself.

Lucioni painting of a conch shell, a pomegranate, and a bent glass bottle arranged in a corner. Luigi Lucioni's art

Luigi Lucioni, “Spanish Bottle,” 1959, oil on linen. DC Moore Gallery.

Over more than sixty years of painting, Lucioni stuck staunchly to his own style. He emulated the Italian Renaissance while rejecting the 1920s’ realist movement, largely an opposite reaction to the avant-garde. This might sound impossible given the common verisimilitude of Renaissance paintings. However, Lucioni found his own niche amidst it all, somewhere between photographic and impressionistic in style.

I don’t think a photograph is realistic, you know, said Lucioni in a 1971 interview. [People] mean to be very complimentary: “Oh it looks just like a photograph,” so I just don’t say anything. But when a critic calls me photographic, then I get a little hurt. Because I don’t think I am photographic. But I am a realist, so I have to accept that limit.

Lucioni painting of two pomegranates, a pear, and a conch shell arranged on a wood surface. still lifes

Luigi Lucioni, “Shell Pattern,” 1947, oil on linen. DC Moore Gallery.

Though his still lifes toe the line of representing objects as they appear in life, there are a host of elements that keep them separate from direct representations of reality. Firstly, Lucioni’s use of color – while muted to an extent – appears almost unburdened by shadow. Certainly, the light he depicts is directional, but it doesn’t detract from the vibrancy of the objects. The fabrics in “Contrasting Textures” and “Shell Pattern” are especially lively examples of this. The tones of any of his vegetables are as well; they appear ripest in the moments he captured them.

His biography at the DC Moore Gallery’s website quotes him saying: I try to create objects that have an existence of their own, landscapes that have space, and solid forms and figure that have life and vitality.

Luigi Lucioni's art Lucioni painting of three Native American-made vessels, a fan, and some sort of clay object arranged on a table

Luigi Lucioni, Indian Textures, 1933, oil on linen. DC Moore Gallery.

In some of his works, such as “Indian Textures” and “Arrangement in Space,” brush strokes are slightly more evident. However, this is only a result of certain objects’ more unusual textures. The metal vase in “Arrangement” appears hammered, reflecting the light in a fashion that would be difficult to replicate without using broader strokes. Lucioni’s approach is somewhat impressionistic here, playing with the appearance of light almost more so than subject. A similar effect is evident in the two vessels flanking the composition of “Indian Textures.”  These are presumably more rough-hewn and “unfinished” objects than one would find mass produced.

Luigi Lucioni's art Lucioni painting of driftwood, a hanging vase, and two jars arranged on a table in a corner

Luigi Lucioni, Arrangement in Space, 1955, oil on linen. DC Moore Gallery.

Finally, Lucioni’s seamless definition of some surfaces makes them appear almost too real. In the aforementioned interview, he said of his still lifes: …once I have set them down, [my intent is] to make them look as absolutely alive as possible. In “Pewter Pitcher and Carnations,” the flowers have finely outlined, individual petals that may as well be real. In addition, the smoothly rendered china cat and dog in “Arrangement in Blue and White” and “White and Gold,” respectively, appear almost too perfect.

Lucioni painting of three carnations (one wilting) in a pewter pitcher with a plaid drape behind them and coiled rope in the right foreground. Luigi Lucioni's art

Luigi Lucioni, Pewter Pitcher and Carnations, 1930, oil on canvas. Dallas Museum of Art.

It doesn’t make any difference to me, said Lucioni of waning interest in his work. I do just what I want to do. It may not be stylish anymore to be photographic but, so what? You can only be yourself. That’s all that matters.

Luigi Lucioni's art Lucioni painting of a glass vase with bamboo, a porcelain hand, china cat, and rectangular dish arranged in front of a floral drape. Luigi Lucioni's art

Luigi Lucioni,Arrangement in Blue and White, 1940, oil on linen. DC Moore Gallery.

After moving to the United States from Malnate, Italy, at age ten, he attended drawing school in New York City. Eventually, he joined the group of artists at the Tiffany Foundation in Oyster Bay, Long Island. Here he painted many still lifes (though not those shown here), largely unimpressed with the landscape:

I had been painting out on Long Island, which is not a very attractive country to paint in, and then suddenly when I came up to Vermont I fell madly in love with the State because it reminded me a little bit of northern Italy…

Luigi Lucioni's art Lucioni painting of an assortment of fruit in a raised bowl, a hen-shaped serving dish, a bunch of grapes, and a china dog arranged on a table in front of patterned wallpaper.

Luigi Lucioni, White and Gold, 1934, oil on linen. DC Moore Gallery.

Lucioni first visited Vermont in 1930, eventually buying a farmhouse. From then on out, he divided his time between the Green Mountains and New York City. Soon after, he became known in the area for his landscapes. Vermont’s art community was small when he first went there, but it grew with and around him over the years.

Lucioni’s career spans decades and styles, indicative of a more or less solitary man who sought the answers to how far he could push his painting. Forever enraptured by the New England countryside and antiquated decoration, he found comfort and settled down, accepting his role as a “senior citizen” toward the end of his life. When he died in 1988 at age 87, he left behind an array of works spanning landscape, still life, and portraiture that deserves a place in art history’s spotlight today.

Find out more:

  • For the full 1971 interview, conducted by Robert Brown, visit Smithsonian Archives of American Art.
  • Luigi Lucioni in the Collection of the Elizabeth De C. Wilson Museum on the Occasion of the Grand Opening 22 July 2000: Y, 2000

Screenwriter; art-lover; barrel-rider.


More in 20th century

  • Arenig School Arenig School

    20th century

    Arenig School. Wild Bohemians and Welsh Mountains


    Welcome to a rollicking adventure with the Arenig School of automatic painting starring Augustus John, James Dickson Innes, and Derwent Lees. Arenig Fawr is a majestic mountain in Snowdonia in Wales. Between 1911 and 1913 three unconventional artists lived and breathed the wild landscape here, possessed...

  • 20th century

    The Prime Minister’s Art: Landscapes of Winston Churchill


    The English statesman Winston Churchill is one of the most respected and admired men in the world. His role as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, especially during World War II, has made him a well-known figure. It is, however, less known that Churchill was a...

  • 20th century

    Kyffin Williams and the Welsh Landscape


    The Welsh landscapes have inspired artists, poets, and writers for generations. But, for one 20th century artist, they were more than just a subject for the canvas, they were a metaphor for melancholic isolation, for power, and comfort. John Kyffin Williams was born in 1918 in...

  • 20th century

    Explore the Unknown World of Klimt’s Landscapes


    When you think of Gustav Klimt, what’s the first thing that comes to mind? If you’re like most people, you probably thought of his portraits and other people paintings. You might not realize that he also painted many other things. In fact, he made quite a...

  • The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living 1991 2170 x 5420 x 1800 mm | 85.5 x 213.4 x 70.9 in Glass, painted steel, silicone, monofilament, shark and formaldehyde solution Formaldehyde Image: Photographed by Prudence Cuming Associates © Damien Hirst and Science Ltd. All rights reserved, DACS 2012 The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living 1991 2170 x 5420 x 1800 mm | 85.5 x 213.4 x 70.9 in Glass, painted steel, silicone, monofilament, shark and formaldehyde solution Formaldehyde Image: Photographed by Prudence Cuming Associates © Damien Hirst and Science Ltd. All rights reserved, DACS 2012

    20th century

    The Story of Damien Hirst’s Famous Shark


    This shark is considered the iconic work of British art from the 1990s and has become a symbol of Britart worldwide. It was funded by Charles Saatchi who in 1991 offered to pay for whatever artwork the artist wanted to create. The shark itself cost Damien Hirst £6,000...

To Top