Connect with us

DailyArtMagazine.com – Art History Stories

Viktor Zaretsky: The Oeuvre of the Ukrainian Gustav Klimt

Zaretskyi Self-portrait

Artists' Stories

Viktor Zaretsky: The Oeuvre of the Ukrainian Gustav Klimt

Viktor Zaretsky is often called the Ukrainian Gustav Klimt. In fact, the influence of Klimt on the artworks of this Ukrainian artist is quite obvious. However, this does not mean that he just copied the works of the Austrian. Zaretsky developed his own artistic language, which made his paintings unique.

Viktor Zaretsky was a 20th century Ukrainian artist. As well as his wife, Alla Horska, a well-known Ukrainian artist we recently talked about, he was one of the Sixtiers. This is a name given in Ukraine to the 1960’s group of artists who rejected the principles of social realism with their creativity and refused to let their artworks (paintings, poems, plays, etc.) serve the interests of the Soviet authorities.

The Sixtiers were part of the dissident movement. They advocated the development of the Ukrainian language and culture as a whole. Therefore, this group of artists laid the foundations for the realization of the rights of the Ukrainian people to their own statehood. That is why the Sixtiers often were followed, summoned for questioning, arrested, and often sent to the penal colonies. Absolutely disobedient ones were destroyed physically.


At the beginning of his career, Zaretsky addressed the themes that resonated with the themes of social realism. However, he did not paint portraits of leaders. His paintings and mosaics reflect themes that found echoes and empathy within himself. For example, the themes of peasant and miner labor.

Social Realism is a pseudo-artistic method that declared a world-view concept of a socialist society. This specific style had nothing to do with the artistic diversity, aesthetics, and uniqueness of the paintings or poems. Art became formulaic because it had only one function – to serve the interests of the authority.

Along with his wife, he was a member of the Creative Youth Club “Contemporary” in Kyiv. Also, Zaretsky and Horska traveled to a number of Ukrainian cities and created amazing mosaics there – Prometheus, Earth, Fire and many more.

The mosaic panel by Viktor Zaretskyi named Prometheus. It portrays two minors.
The Ukrainian Klimt: Viktor Zaretsky (in co-production), mosaic panel Prometheus, 1966. Soviet mosaics in Ukraine.

During the same period, Zaretsky had been working on paintings in an avant-garde style. Reality was peeling off, and the so-called peasant cycle alternated with the urban one.

1970 was a tragic year for Zaretsky. He lost both his father and wife on the same day. A full investigation was never done and the case was thrown out as domestic violence. Allegedly, Zaretsky’s father first killed his daughter-in-law and then committed suicide by throwing himself under a train. However, there were many inconsistencies in the case to indicate that it had been fabricated. Horska’s family and her entourage were certain that her murder was perpetrated by the KGB as well as murder of Zaretsky’s father, not suicide.

The photo of Viktor Zaretskyi and his wife Alla Horska. It was made in 1960s.
The Ukrainian Klimt: Viktor Zaretsky and Alla Horska, 1960s. Ukrainian Unofficial.

After these tragic events, depression dragged on. There were fewer social contacts and much more work in Zaretsky’s life. It would seem that in such tough periods of life when all the senses are mixed up in a whirlpool of emotion, the canvases should have gloomier subjects and colors. Perhaps, but not in the case of Zaretsky. His Secession style paintings, for which he was nicknamed the Ukrainian Klimt and made him famous, were created in the 1970s-80s.

The painting "The Kiss" in Klimt's and Zaretskyi's versions.
Gustav Klimt, The Kiss, 1907-1908 (Bridgeman Images) VS Viktor Zaretsky, The Kiss, 1984 (Ukrainian Unofficial).
The comparison of Klimt's and Zaretskyi's paintigs with a garden.
Gustav Klimt, Bauerngarten, 1907 (Bridgeman Images) VS Viktor Zaretsky, Mallow, 1989 (Ukrainian Unofficial).

“When visiting art exhibitions in the mid-1980s, I repeatedly came across dazzlingly beautiful and reliant on unexpected artistic language landscapes, genre compositions, portraits by Viktor Zaretsky. They impressed me, awoke the imagination, and made me scared. His female portraits were especially attractive. The artist depicted his models as princesses from childhood dreams or as Egyptian queens in the paintings of the New Kingdom era, or like women in the portraits by Diego Velazquez, as well as in the mystical paintings of Pre-Raphaelites or pictures by Gustav Klimt. Their clothes and accessories were brightly decorative. They were pictured against the background of mosaic-like scattered gems or whimsical patterns of flowers and ornamental motifs. All this was absolutely atypical for the then-dominant art of socialist realism.”

Olesya Avramenko, Ukrainian art critic

Of course, the use of vivid colors does not mean that there was no more anger, pain, grief, anxiety, or indignation. In particular, he repeatedly portrayed his wife – in an allegorical way or not.

For the artist, reality and his hopes that it did not live up to flaked away. The latter settled in the paintings. For some time, Zaretsky’s life continued exactly there, where hope was still alive.


This is a fantasy world, alive, bright, with unusual compositional solutions. The style is actually very similar to Klimt’s. However, Zaretsky added a lot of his own creativity. In particular, elements of Ukrainian folk and decorative-applied art are often presented.

The painting of Viktor Zaretskyi "The plowman", 1989. It's portrayed the plowman and the horse during the work in the field.
The Ukrainian Klimt: Viktor Zaretsky, The plowman, 1989. Ukrainian Unofficial.

“The refinement of composition choices, eroticism, and philosophical approach, which were the basis of the concept of the Secession style in general and the work of Klimt in particular captivated Zaretsky for some time. The close affinity of his own views and worldview with the work of Klimt was very impressive. The artist had the feeling that he had found a long lost thing, it was as if he had met a twin brother, who he was separated from in time and space. Everything seemed to be not accidental to him. Zaretsky saw Klimt not as a guru, but as a fellow fighter and colleague who came to similar conclusions and achievements in his work, only with other accents emphasized and other nuances revealed, as determined by his age and social system. Zaretsky saw in Klimt his own alter ego, found in him something that he had no chance to experience, namely freedom of creativity without ideological limitations.”

Olesya Avramenko

During his life, Zaretsky had only one solo exhibition. It took place in the exhibition hall of the Kyiv House of Scientists in 1989, a year before the death of the creator of Ukrainian neo-secession.

The photo of Viktor Zaretskyi, 1989.
The Ukrainian Klimt: The photo of Viktor Zaretsky, 1989. Ukrainian Unofficial.

Zaretsky’s works are appreciated both in the Ukrainian cultural space and outside it. For example, in 1990, twenty paintings by the artist were sold at Christie’s auction.

In addition to museums, Zaretsky’s paintings are stored in private collections in Ukraine, Great Britain, Switzerland, and France. The value of his artworks is also indicated by the fact that among the paintings of Ukrainian artists, Zaretsky’s artworks are most often forged.

I am a Ukrainian journalist, who used to write about politics a lot. But I do not do that anymore. First of all, I love art (even if this art is Untitled XXV by Willem de Kooning). Second of all, it is much easier to stay cool writing about freaks in the art world, than about ones in the political world. Third of all, art teaches us to reflect on around and inside us; politics, in the opposite, mostly teaches us not to think at all. So let’s try to save some brain cells talking about cultural heritage.

Comments

More in Artists' Stories

  • dailyart

    Painting of the Week: Roy Lichtenstein, Artist’s Studio – The Dance

    By

    Roy Lichtenstein was a famous American Pop artist, most well known for his original technique of mixed media on canvas, which was meant to remind the viewer of comic strips and movies of the 1950s. His work is full of visual parody and puns, and so...

  • The best can-can paintings in Art History. The best can-can paintings in Art History.

    19th Century

    Moulin Rouge and the Folies Bergère: Best Can-Can Paintings in Art History

    By

    Can-can paintings depict the most famous dance of La Belle Époque era. Originating in France, the Can-can, associated with skirts, petticoats, high kicks, splits, and cartwheels became popular in the 1840s. Although originally danced by both women and men, it is now traditionally associated with a...

  • 20th century

    LEGO Architecture: Build Your Very Own Modernist House

    By

    Lego gives us the opportunity to create our own world. We’ve all played as kids creating the most amazing places from our imagination or even to recreate our favorite movies sets. Then, when you grow up, as an architecture lover (or even as an architect), those...

  • 20th century

    Jeff Koons and His Balloon Dogs

    By

    What do Jeff Koons, Jay Z, Christie’s, and clowns have in common? Balloon dogs! Read how an artwork looking like a huge toy hit USD 58.4m at a Christie’s auction becoming one of the most expensive artworks by a living artist ever sold at auction. Jeff...

  • 20th century

    Max Ernst and Birds: A Relationship Explained Through Paintings

    By

    Max Ernst (1891–1976) was a prolific German avant-garde artist. He was a pioneer in the early 20th century movements of Dada and Surrealism and developed a number of inventive artistic techniques. Ernst had the ability to make the unbelievable believable through his art. For this reason,...

To Top

Just to let you know, DailyArt Magazine’s website uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features and to analyse traffic. Read cookies policy