fbpx
Connect with us

DailyArtMagazine.com – Art History Stories

Art and Justice: The Forgotten Case of Bird in Space by Constantin Brâncuși

Constantin Brâncuși, Bird in Space, exhibited at the National Gallery of Australia in Canberra. Flickr.

Sculpture

Art and Justice: The Forgotten Case of Bird in Space by Constantin Brâncuși

In 1926, Bird in Space crossed the Atlantic Ocean from Paris to New York City for an exhibition at the Brummer Gallery, curated by one of Brâncuși‘s most trusted friends – Marcel Duchamp. But what was different this time? This is the amazing case of Bird in Space and how it set a precedent, changing the legal definition of art forever.

Who Was Constantin Brâncuși?

Constantin Brâncuși was a sculptor born in 1876, in Hobizta, a small Romanian village. He attended the Academy of Fine Arts in Bucharest and then left for Paris in 1904. After two months under Rodin’s apprenticeship, Brâncuși decided to pave his own way towards an abstract approach to sculpture, one that concentrated on the essence of things, rather than physical qualities. He said:

“I felt that I was not giving anything by following the conventional mode of sculpture.

Photograph of Constantin Brancusi, sculptor
Photo of Constantin Brâncuși. Christie’s.

As the years went by, he gained international fame. Nowadays, his oeuvres are displayed at museums such as MoMA, Guggenheim, and The Metropolitan. Brâncuși’s artistic style is characterized by an unexpected interest in light and movement in a Spatio-temporal context, enriched with inflexible materials and modesty in the finer details.

What’s with All the Birds?

One of Brâncuși’s lifelong passions was the motif of the bird, which he addressed for over forty years in more than thirty works, in sculptures such as his Maiastra, Golden Bird and Bird in Space sequels.
Maybe the most recognizable one, L’Oiseau dans L’Espace (Bird in Space, 1923-1940), is an acute example of detail reduction and depiction of flight in connection with the materialistic world. He played with diverse materials in this series of sixteen models, all smoothened out by the artist himself. Brâncuși reduced the beak and the head of the animal to a slanting oval and elongated the body to such an extent that no feather or wings can be noticed. The graceful footing raises the bird into the ether, with an upward accelerating motion.

 Constantin Brancusi, Bird in Space, 1926, Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, WA, USA. Photo by Paul Macapia.
Constantin Brâncuși, Bird in Space, 1926, Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, WA, USA. Photo by Paul Macapia.
 Brancusi’s workshop, Paris 1925, Paris. Photo by Edward Steichen.
Brâncuși’s workshop, Paris 1925, Paris. Photo by Edward Steichen.

Brâncuși vs. the USA

A version of Bird in Space was sent for an exhibition in New York but when it reached the border, the Customs officials imposed a 40% tariff on its value, even though, according to the Tariff Act of 1922, all works of art were permitted to enter the country free of tax. Apparently, Brâncuși’s artwork did not fit the definition of sculpture at that time, being categorized instead under “Kitchen utensils and Hospital Supplies” as a “manufacture of metal”.
Edward Steichen, the owner of the sculpture, along with other supporters of Brâncuși, enraged by this negligence, complained in the defense of Bird in Space. The US government adopted a strategy which aimed to prove whether or not the sculpture depicted a real bird, putting pressure on witnesses to answer the question. According to the legislation, the sculpture is “that branch of the free fine arts which chisels or carves out” for “subsequent reproduction by carving or casting, imitation of natural objects, chiefly the human form, and represents such objects in their true proportions of length, breadth, and thickness” (Treasury Decisions Under Customs and Other Laws: Volume 63, United States, Department of the Treasury. December 31, 1932, U.S. Government Printing Office).
The defense maintained a strong position regarding the irrelevance of the definition of sculpture in this context, as the new school of art, which focused on abstraction, was gaining importance at the time. It also specified that the piece was an original made by a professional artist. When called to the stand, critic Frank Crowninshield articulated:

“It has the suggestion of flight, it suggests grace, aspiration, vigor, coupled with speed in the spirit of strength, potency, beauty, just as a bird does. But just the name, the title, of this work, why, really, it does not mean much.”

This was a meaningful argument since it managed to convince the court that their definition of art was outdated. Abstraction is about ideas, not depiction, as it speaks to each of us differently since we feel and see based on our past experiences. The verdict of Judge J. Waite stated that “Whether we are in sympathy with these newer ideas and the schools which represent them, we think the facts of their existence and their influence upon the art world as recognized by the courts must be considered.” Nevertheless, they should be acknowledged. Bird in Space was allowed in the end, free entry to the country under section 1704 (of a US law), as it was decided that it had “purely ornamental purposes” and “is the original production of a professional sculptor”.

Constantin Brancusi, Bird in Space. Photo by Edward Steichen.
Constantin Brâncuși, Bird in Space. Photo by Edward Steichen.

And Now What?

Today, the famous Bird in Space is at the Seattle Art Museum, but sadly, not on display. Over the course of nearly a century, Bird in Space set a courageous example of modern, controversial ideas that changed the world of art as we view it nowadays. Brâncuși began as a simple boy but evolved into a complex sculptor who battled for his rightful place in history. He should be remembered for his creative genius which taught us a lesson about acceptance and innovation. As “real birds” transform into fluid movements full of feeling, our perspective on life should adapt to the new ideas that are yet to come.

Full-time art history fanatic. Her other interests include global politics, music, and philosophy. As it happens, she would like to make a pun but she Kant. Her favorite art movement is Impressionism.

Comments

More in Sculpture

  • 20th century

    Dive into the World of Fairy Tales with Čiurlionis

    By

    Wouldn’t it be nice to immerse yourself in a fairy tale: hike among the heroes, fight monsters, visit enchanted lands? It would be a nice break from reality for sure. That is why today we present paintings that dwell in the fantasy world of fairy tales...

  • 20th century

    Living in the Shadow – Marie and Peder Severin Krøyer

    By

    Marie and Peder Severin Krøyer were a 19th and early 20th century couple, and, while their marriage and lives were far from ideal, history has judged them both to have been truly notable painters. When Peder Severin Krøyer met the young Marie, he was already an established...

  • Abstraction

    All You Need to Know About Color Field Painting

    By

    Ready for a rollercoaster ride through the world of color field painting? Strap yourself in, it’s going to be a long and wild ride! This article will explore all you need to know about this art movement, its development throughout history, and its most prominent artists....

  • 20th century

    Beyond the Biennale – Top Five Art Museums to Visit in Venice

    By

    Venice, with its long history, is an open museum that will leave none unsatisfied. La Serenissima is a dream destination for every art lover. Apart from the many historic sites like San Marco’s Basilica and the Doge’s Palace, there is a myriad of art museums spanning...

  • 20th century

    Tōkyō Thrift – Japonisme and the Japanese Bauhaus

    By

    The historical narrative of Modernism is overwhelmingly western. However, the history of the movement is, in reality, one of constant diffusion between the East and West; between Europe and Japan. It is an area of study that has been under-explored, but in the development of the...

To Top