History

Bondage and Freedom—The Protest Art of Two Abolitionists

Helen Jeffery 19 February 2024 min Read

Since the elites in power like the status quo, social reform is a grassroots movement.  How do reformers engage the masses? With art. Should protest art show the suffering that needs reform, or the aspiration instead? We look at the Abolitionist movement to see examples of both approaches.

Society’s Janus Face

High society in Georgian England (1714-1837) was sumptuous. Such fashion and scenery are reasons the novels of Jane Austen, and TV shows such as Bridgerton are so beloved. Their set-piece words are even fun to say—chatelaines, passementerie, waistcoat fobs, porcelain pieces, Chinoiserie. Yet, the other side of the Georgian economy was terribly ugly and immeasurably cruel. The forced enslavement of people is one of the worst atrocities of history.

Although deemed an illegal trade in 1771, slavery existed in Georgian England. Stories from sailors, travelers, and the formerly enslaved, and news of lawsuits and uprisings, meant the terrible nature of slavery were known in every drawing room.

abolitionist art: Pamphlet printed by James Philips, 1787,  Victoria and Albert Museum, London, UK.

Pamphlet printed by James Philips, 1787,  Victoria and Albert Museum, London, UK.

“Am I Not a Man and a Brother?”

Some businessmen could not stay silent. In May 1787, a group of outsider religious businessmen formed the Society for Effecting the Abolition of the Slave Trade. Since most of these men were not Church of England, they could not directly participate in Parliament. To effect change, they had to speak to the masses. They created an emblem.

It pictures a kneeling black man under the slogan, “Am I Not a Man and a Brother?” The Society relied on the Quaker printer, James Phillips, and even met above his shop. Phillips brought about the seal’s creation, although it is not known who actually designed it. Society Tracts with this image were printed by Phillips in the thousands. However, it was another member, Josiah Wedgewood, who ensured the seal really proliferated.

abolitionist art: Jaspar trials, with numbers keyed to Wedgwood’s Experiment Book, 1773-1776, Wedgwood Museum – Barlaston, Stoke-on-Trent, England, UK. Wikimedia Commons (public domain). 

Jaspar trials, with numbers keyed to Wedgwood’s Experiment Book, 1773-1776, Wedgwood Museum – Barlaston, Stoke-on-Trent, England, UK. Wikimedia Commons (public domain). 

The Industrial Revolution in Full Swing

20 years earlier, fellow English Quaker Josiah Wedgewood began the process of industrializing pottery production.  Among other innovations, he created Jasperware—a matte-finished pottery that got its color not from glaze, but from staining the clay.  He also developed kiln techniques that allowed for mass production. The abolitionist idea was hatched for Josiah Wedgewood to cast the Society’s seal into clay and distribute it freely. The little clay coin fast became a Georgian “it” item.

abolitionist art: The Wedgewood Medallion in a jewelry setting (left, Victoria and Albert Museum, London, UK) and a 1785-179 Portrait showing the fashion for wearing charms or medallions on fob-pocket ribbons (right).

The Wedgewood Medallion in a jewelry setting (left, Victoria and Albert Museum, London, UK) and a 1785-179 Portrait showing the fashion for wearing charms or medallions on fob-pocket ribbons (right).

The “It” Protest Item

The Wedgewood medallion, just 3-4 cm wide, was instantly popular. It was incorporated into the aforementioned sumptuous equipage of high society—watch chains and ribbons, hat pins, jewelry, snuff boxes, porcelainware—all means of ornament were used to wear and display this message of Abolition. But, like society itself, the image was dualistic; is the message decorative or earnest? Is the figure an object of pity or strength? Is he entreating Man or God?

The emblem became the most famous, most proliferated illustration of a black man at the time. It is troubling, through today’s lens, that this would be so of an image that features enslavement and supplication. (See The History of Harlem Renaissance in the USA  for a painted example, such as Into Bondage by Aaron Douglas that images self-rescue, rather than a plea to an outside hero.)

In fact, another Abolitionist was troubled by such images and set out to offer an alternative.

abolitionist art: Frederick Douglass, dagguerreotype, c. 1855, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City, NY, USA.

Frederick Douglass, dagguerreotype, c. 1855, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City, NY, USA.

A New Type of Protest Image

In September 1838, Frederick Douglass escaped from slavery in Maryland, USA. He spent the rest of his life lobbying for Abolition and equality. Douglass didn’t trust artistic representation, where image manipulation by others is possible.  He felt the new 19th-century medium of photography allowed him to control his portrayal.

Frederick Douglass took control not only of his image, but also his narrative. Furthermore, like Wedgewood, he understood that his chosen medium facilitated mass distribution.

abolitionist art: Matthew Brady, Frederick Douglass, c. 1880, Gilman Collection, Museum Purchase, 2005, Metropolitan Museum of Art,  New York City, NY, USA.

Matthew Brady, Frederick Douglass, c. 1880, Gilman Collection, Museum Purchase, 2005, Metropolitan Museum of Art,  New York City, NY, USA.

The Most Photographed Man

Photos of Frederick Douglass powerfully convey the qualities and attributes that enslaved Black people were denied at the time, and the aspiration for them. It is believed he taught photographers of the day the art of posing, reinventing their subject matter from the outer trappings of people caught under light, to the inner radiance of living and feeling beings.

Douglass distributed his photos freely. He included them in letters and in his widely published books and speeches. He became the most photographed man—from any background—of the 19th century. Always distinguished and well dressed, he self-illustrated promise, dignity, and hope.

Image of Suffering or Image of Dignity?

Both Douglass and Wedgewood used new art technologies and new techniques of mass production to deliver their protest, and their objects were widely seen. One chose an image of suffering and subjugation. The other chose an image of aspiration and dignity. There is no data letting us know the comparative success to the cause. It is up to each new reformer to decide what and how they immortalize their cause in art and its symbols.

Get your daily dose of art

Click and follow us on Google News to stay updated all the time

Recommended

History

Joséphine de Beauharnais: Patron of the Arts

Joséphine de Beauharnais was born in Martinique as Marie Josèphe Rose Tascher de La Pagerie. She evolved into the sophisticated and cultured...

Maya M. Tola 20 May 2024

History

Do You Fancy a Party? Elegant Gatherings in Art

Social gatherings have consistently inspired artists across history, enabling them to encapsulate the spirit of diverse eras, cultures, and social...

Maya M. Tola 2 May 2024

History

The Great Depression: An Unprecedented Time in Art History

In the late 1920s and early 1930s, the Great Depression wreaked havoc on the world, especially in the United States. In 1933,  Franklin D. Roosevelt...

Sam Malone 1 May 2024

A Victorian Christmas card featuring a robin in a top hat and a robin in a bonnet. The text reads: ‘Happy returns. Christmas comes but once a year.’ History

Victorian Christmas Cards: Strange or Timeless?

It’s thanks to the Victorians that the tradition of sending Christmas cards exists. The very first commercial Christmas card was sent in 1843, and...

Jenna Burns 7 February 2024