Masterpiece Stories

Masterpiece Story: Madonna by Edvard Munch

Maia Heguiaphal 12 December 2022 min Read

The Norwegian painter Edvard Munch realized the colored lithograph Madonna in 1895. He is considered the precursor of Expressionism, therefore his Madonna is imbued with its characteristics. Expressionism, born in the early 20th century, expresses a reality distorted by the subjectivity of the artist. The use of symbols, bright colors and marked features causes an emotional reaction in the spectator.

This Madonna gathers those characteristics. Edvard Munch strays from the traditional representations of the Virgin Mary and depicts her as a mystical woman. The multiples ambivalences on the painting show this mystic and the complexity of her figure.

Madonna: Not a Biblical Mother, But a Sensual Woman

Edvard Munch, Madonna
Edvard Munch, Madonna, 1895-1902, Ōhara Museum of Art,  Kurashiki, Japan.

We can recognize this woman as Madonna thanks to a few details: the fetus that makes her a mother, and the blue halo around her head. Blue is the color traditionally associated with Madonna. Thick and curvy black lines overshadow this blue background. However, those lines let the blue appear on top of the woman’s head. As if only she could make it appear. She has a connection with the blue, it is part of her. Then, look at her belly, it is the only part of her body that is completely immaculate, a symbol of purity.

Edvard Munch, Madonna, 1895-1902, Ōhara Museum of Art,  Kurashiki, Japan. Detail.

However, Munch paints this woman bare breasted, in a lascivious attitude. Her nudity echos her humanity. Indeed, it is very rare to cross path with a naked Madonna. In Christian religion (as many others) and its pictorial representation, the artists, whose art is often a command from the Church, always hide the female body.

Edvard Munch, Madonna
Edvard Munch, Madonna, 1895-1902, Ōhara Museum of Art,  Kurashiki, Japan. Detail.

On her face, with her eyes closed, we can see that she has abandoned herself to a wave of pleasure. The painter represents a woman in the act of love. Her position, facing the spectator, gives an impression of power coming from her. Through her posture she asserts her sexuality.

Her body, arms and hair merge into sinuous black lines that surround and cover the virginal blue. Those lines seem to possess each part of the woman except for her stomach, that is thus shown as pure. When I see the movement, the dynamic of the lines and the way they contour the body, I can’t help thinking about a sensual figure, which seems contradictory with the idea of purity given by her stomach and her name.

Therefore we can see a duality between divine purity and sensuality. However; the encounter of the two aspects in the portrait creates a sensation of fusion. Here, Munch insists on the polysemy of the figure of the Madonna which expresses itself through the encounter of life and death in the same character.

When Death and Life Meet

On the one hand, the Virgin Mary as a pregnant woman incarnates life. In the painting she carries a future baby. It is here where the fetus has a literal connection to its mother by the umbilical cordon.

Edvard Munch, Madonna, 1895-1902, Ōhara Museum of Art,  Kurashiki, Japan. Detail.

On the other, she seems to extricate herself from the profound and tormented nothingness that is the background of the painting. She is able to do that thanks to the contrast between the whiteness of her stomach and the dark background. However, as I said, some parts of her body disappear in this darkness, as if she was sucked by it. Take a look at her hair and arms.

Edvard Munch, Madonna, 1895-1902, Ōhara Museum of Art,  Kurashiki, Japan. Detail.

The shadows on her face, as the veil of death, is darker on her closed eyes and her hollowed cheeks. Her features are reminiscent of the “Calaveras” (Mexican masks for the Day of the Dead).

The Calavera is the skeleton in the center.
Diego Rivera, Sueño de una Tarde Dominical en la Alameda Central, 1946, mural, Mexico City, Mexico. Photo by momo via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0).

The look of the fetus stresses the presence of death. It is symbolically linked with life, a newborn to be. But, here it looks like a ghost, with arms crossed like the one of the dead. It creates a very creepy and heavy atmosphere.

Edvard Munch, Madonna
Edvard Munch, Madonna, 1895-1902, Ōhara Museum of Art,  Kurashiki, Japan. Detail.

Finally, those multiple ambivalences create a mystery but at the same time give a visual explanation to one of the great mystery of Christian religion: the creation of the Christ.

Symbolism had an important impact on Munch’s work. He used its codification to paint abstraction, giving it narrative aspects. In fact, symbolism plays with the invitation to decipher the mysteries in the painting and in subjects that are beyond comprehension.

Symbolism enables the painter to represent God, the maker of Christ. He is materialized through the spermatozoids heading to the Virgin’s stomach to fertilize her. The color of the background of the spermatozoids echos the Virgin’s halo, it underlines the relation between God and Madonna and confirms her divine aspect.

Edvard Munch, Madonna, 1895-1902, Ōhara Museum of Art,  Kurashiki, Japan. Detail.

Finally, we have seen that thanks to the use of symbolism, Munch managed to give a narrative vision to a mystical scene. This mystic that is also part of Madonna makes her a very ambiguous character. The purity associated with her name contrasts with the apparent affirmation of her sexuality and the expression of a certain pleasure. She is human and she is divine, she flirts with Eros and with Thanatos.

Read about Munch’s relation to death here.


Ten Symbols of Longevity, Joseon Dynasty, ca 1866-1910, ink and color on silk, Ewha Womans University Museum, Seoul, South Korea. Detail. Masterpiece Stories

Masterpiece Story: Ten Symbols of Longevity

Ten Symbols of Longevity is a landscape masterpiece of Korean art. It is a beautiful world filled with earthly perfection and cosmic energy. The...

James W Singer 30 January 2023

Cornelis Saftleven, Who Sues for a Cow?, 1629, oil on wood panel, Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Detail. Masterpiece Stories

Masterpiece Story: Who Sues for a Cow by Cornelis Saftleven

Who Sues for a Cow is a masterpiece of social commentary by now-forgotten artist, Cornelis Saftleven. It is a strange painting from the Dutch Golden...

James W Singer 16 January 2023

Frederic Edwin Church, Aurora Borealis, 1865, Smithsonian American Art Museum, Washington, DC, USA. Detail. Masterpiece Stories

Masterpiece Story: Aurora Borealis by Frederic Edwin Church

Aurora Borealis is an American national treasure. It explores the relationship between the land, its viewer, and its destiny. It is a masterpiece of...

James W Singer 9 January 2023

Claude Monet, Magpie, 1868-69, Musée d'Orsay, Paris, France. Detail. Masterpiece Stories

Masterpiece Story: Magpie by Claude Monet

Magpie is a masterpiece by Claude Monet that captures the poetic play of light upon a winter landscape. It is a symphony of ivory and...

James W Singer 5 January 2023