When did Mannierism give way to a new style? Was it with Caravaggio‘s dramatic lighting or Rubens‘s opulence? Can we distinguish a moment in history or an artist with whom the new era of painting began? I think that the development of art is a continuous process and a product of many heads (and hands!), but some claim that Annibale Carracci was the inventor of Baroque painting. Let’s see why:
Time for a Daily Portion of Beans
High Renaissance and Mannerism did not show everyday life. They were all about idealized beautiful bodies of Olympus gods and goddesses, or suffering but still handsome bodies of Christ, and eternally young Madonnas with Child. There was no place for ugly farmers in their straw hats eating even uglier and smellier everyday beans. Carracci, influenced by Bartolomeo Passerotti, one of Bologna’s chief artists, changed the trend. He wanted to depict life as it was: rough and grey.
(Every time I look at this painting I think of Van Gogh’s Potato Eaters. Carracci’s drive to show the real might have appealed to young Vincent).
Raw Meat and Raw Painting
Here comes yet another scene from everyday life. Matt, earthly colors are applied in thick brushstrokes and the impasto (which stands for the texture of the paint applied thickly on canvas) is very rough, too. The subject of butchers and raw meat recurred in art history quite frequently after Carracci: it was taken up by Rembrandt, Chaim Soutine, and Francis Bacon.
New Green Genre
Remember any Renaissance landscapes? Not really? Well, that’s the thing, painters did not paint landscapes on their own, they used them only as lovely backgrounds for portraits or religious scenes. Therefore, the River Landscape is an early example of a ‘pure’ landscape, in which the human presence became incidental (can you spot a tiny oarsman on his boat?). Can we assume that Carracci began a new genre in painting and gave way to such masters as Claude Lorrain and Nicolas Poussin?
Old but New Gods
Carracci was also a master of frescoes, to the extent that having achieved acclaim in his native Bologna, he was recommended to the Farnese family in Rome. He was commissioned to decorate rooms in Farnese palace according to an iconographical program devised by the librarian of the Farnese family, Fulvio Orsini, which included stories of Ulysses, Perseus, Hercules’ labors, and examples of virtuous behavior. The choice of Hercules at the Crossroads was a choice between Virtue and Vice described by Xenophon, a classical Greek writer.
At first sight, we may say that this painting is not much different from Mannierist scenes depicting Olympus, or Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel Ceiling from 1508-12: the figures are VERY muscular, their robes if they wear any (ekhm…), highly stylized. Yet, there is something different: is it a hidden subtle symbolism, Rubens-like body sizes, or bright colors, and quite a dynamic composition? Or maybe a combination of these?
Click and follow us on Google News to stay updated all the time
We love art history and writing about it. Your support helps us to sustain DailyArt Magazine and keep it running.
DailyArt Magazine needs your support. Every contribution, however big or small, is very valuable for our future. Thanks to it, we will be able to sustain and grow the Magazine. Thank you for your help!
Magda, art historian and Italianist, she writes about art because she cannot make it herself. She loves committed and political artists like Ai Weiwei or the Futurists; like Joseph Beuys she believes that art can change us and we can change the world.
Many things could be said about Rubens, perhaps the most important and influential Flemish painter of the 17th century. Genius of the Baroque, representative of sensuality, dynamism and movement in its splendor the painter was above all a great humanist, a lover of the Greco-Roman tradition and therefore of its mythology.
Today we present him and the main features of his style to you through three myths!